> Gary Denton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: <snip> > I had posted this before: DDT was not banned. > > http://www.malaria.org/inthenews.html > > There was a proposal to ban it entirely in December, > it failed becuase > of the poor countries who still use it for malaria > control. > > Why use DDT? It can be highly effective for several > years in killing > mosquitos. (Eventually mosquitos more immune to DDT > predominate.) > Alternatives are about 50% more expensive. > > Why not use DDT? The World Wildlife Fund and > Physicians for Social > Responsibility, among many others, indict DDT > chillingly: as a > carcinogen, a teratogen, an immunosupressant, that > stays in biological > systems and concentrates as it moves up the food > chain. It was > responsible for almost wiping out some species of > birds in the United > States and measurable quantities were being detected > in mother's milk. > > The treaty on banning persistent organic pollutants > such as DDT > decided to make an exception for malaria control. > However, some > people, ahem, have decided to make this an issue to > bash environmentalists. > > For a paper from both sides before the treaty vote > see here: > http://bmj.bmjjournals.com/cgi/content/full/321/7273/1403
Thanks for the post; I think I hadn't yet read yours when I responded -- one of the cardinal sins on Brin-L! <grin> Debbi who still has over 250 posts to read, and may never get to resond to some as she'd like __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Movies - Buy advance tickets for 'Shrek 2' http://movies.yahoo.com/showtimes/movie?mid=1808405861
_______________________________________________ http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l