<<http://news.com.com/2010-1028-5204405.html>>

U.S. blunders with keyword blacklist
May 3, 2004, 8:00 AM PT 
By Declan McCullagh 
 
The U.S. government concocted a brilliant plan a few years ago: Why not
give Internet surfers in China and Iran the ability to bypass their
nations' notoriously restrictive blocks on Web sites? 
Soon afterward, the U.S. International Broadcasting Bureau (IBB) invented
a way to let people in China and Iran easily route around censorship by
using a U.S.-based service to view banned sites such as BBC News, MIT and
Amnesty International. 

But an independent report released Monday reveals that the U.S.
government also censors what Chinese and Iranian citizens can see online.
Technology used by the IBB, which puts out the Voice of America
broadcasts, prevents them from visiting Web addresses that include a
peculiar list of verboten keywords. The list includes "ass" (which
inadvertently bans usembassy.state.gov), "breast" (breastcancer.com),
"hot" (hotmail.com and hotels.com), "pic" (epic.noaa.gov) and "teen"
(teens.drugabuse.gov). 

"The minute you try to temper assistance with evading censorship with
judgments about how that power should be used by citizens, you start down
a path from which there's no clear endpoint," said Jonathan Zittrain, a
Harvard University law professor and co-author of the report prepared by
the OpenNet Initiative. The report was financed in part by the MacArthur
Foundation and George Soros' Open Society Institute. 

That's the sad irony in the OpenNet Initiative's findings: A government
agency charged with fighting Internet censorship is quietly censoring the
Web itself. 

The list unintentionally reveals its author's views of what's appropriate
and inappropriate.  
The IBB has justified a filtered Internet connection by arguing that it's
inappropriate for U.S. funds to help residents of China and Iran--both of
which receive dismal ratings from human rights group Freedom House--view
pornography. 

In the abstract, the argument is a reasonable one. If the IBB's service
had blocked only hard-core pornographic Web sites, few people would
object. 

Instead, the list unintentionally reveals its author's views of what's
appropriate and inappropriate. The official naughty-keyword list displays
a conservative bias that labels any Web address with "gay" in them as
verboten--a decision that affects thousands of Web sites that deal with
gay and lesbian issues, as well as DioceseOfGaylord.org, a Roman Catholic
site. 

More to the point, the U.S. government could have set a positive example
to the world regarding acceptance of gays and lesbians--especially in
Iran, which punishes homosexuality with death. 

In order to reach the IBB censorship-evading service, people in China or
Iran connect to contractor Anonymizer's Web site. Then they can use
Anonymizer.com as a kind of jumping-off point, also called a proxy
server, to visit Web sites banned by their governments.

Ken Berman, who oversees the China and Iran Internet projects at IBB,
said Anonymizer came up with the list of dirty words. "We did not,"
Berman said. "Basically, we said, 'Implement a porn filter.' We were
looking for serious, hard-core nasty stuff to block...I couldn't come up
with a list (of off-limits words) if my life depended on it." 

In an e-mail to the OpenNet Initiative on Monday morning, Berman defended
the concept of filtering as a way to preserve bandwidth. "Since the U.S.
taxpayers are financing this program...there are legitimate limits that
may be imposed," his message said. "These limits are hardly restrictive
in finding any and all human rights, pro-democracy, dissident and other
sites, as well as intellectual, religious, governmental and commercial
sites. The porn filtering is a trade-off we feel is a proper balance and
that, as noted in your Web release, frees up bandwidth for other uses and
users." 

OpenNet Initiative did its research by connecting to the Anonymizer
service from computers in Iran and evaluating which Google Web searches
were blocked that theoretically should not be. 

The report concludes: "For example, usembassy.state.gov is unavailable
due to the presence of the letters 'ass' within the server's host name,
and sussex.police.uk is unavailable for the same reason. In addition, the
words 'my' and 'tv,' which are also domain suffixes, are filtered by IBB
Anonymizer. As a consequence, all Web hosts registered within the domain
name systems of Malaysia and Tuvalu are unavailable." 

"For example, usembassy.state.gov is unavailable due to the presence of
the letters 'ass' within the server's host name." 
--OpenNet Initiative's report  
Harvard University's Berkman Center worked on the project, as did the
University of Toronto's Nart Villeneuve and Michelle Levesque. They
tested only connections from Iran, but Anonymizer said the same list of
keywords was used for China.

The U.S. government "asked us to filter broadly based on keywords to
generally restrict" Web sites, says Lance Cottrell, founder and president
of San Diego-based Anonymizer. "What they didn't want to get into was
something complex, fine-grained filtering which is going to try to remove
all the porn. What they wanted was something that would generally remove
most of the adult content while not blocking most of the information that
these people need."

Cottrell said Anonymizer would manually unblock non-pornographic Web
sites if requested by Chinese or Iranian Net surfers. "Literally, we have
never been contacted with a complaint about overbroad blocking," he said.

Monday's report also takes a swipe at IBB and Anonymizer for not using
the SSL encryption method to scramble the Web browsing behavior of
Iranian citizens. "I would think that if the U.S. government is going to
go through the trouble of funding and offering the service, they might
offer the more secure one," Harvard's Zittrain said.

Anonymizer's Cottrell said he discontinued that feature because "it
seemed to cause trouble for a lot of people. The utilization of the
service went way down." Iran currently doesn't monitor the contents of
Web pages downloaded. But if that changed, encryption would be turned
back on, Cottrell said. (Because China does do that kind of monitoring,
SSL is already enabled for Chinese users.)

This episode represents a temporary black eye for IBB, but it should also
serve as a permanent lesson to the agency. When American taxpayers are
paying the bill, any "anticensorship" scheme needs to be beyond reproach.


-----
Shrub 04:
Don't Switch Horsemen Mid-Apocalypse

_______________________________________________
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l

Reply via email to