http://www.newyorker.com/fact/content/?040524fa_fact


THE GRAY ZONE
by SEYMOUR M. HERSH
How a secret Pentagon program came to Abu Ghraib

New Yorker Magazine
Issue of 2004-05-24
Posted 2004-05-15

  The roots of the Abu Ghraib prison scandal lie not in the criminal
  inclinations of a few Army reservists but in a decision, approved
  last year by Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld, to expand a highly
  secret operation, which had been focussed on the hunt for Al Qaeda, to
  the interrogation of prisoners in Iraq. Rumsfeld's decision embittered
  the American intelligence community, damaged the effectiveness of
  �lite combat units, and hurt America's prospects in the war on terror.

  According to interviews with several past and present American
  intelligence officials, the Pentagon's operation, known inside the
  intelligence community by several code words, including Copper
  Green, encouraged physical coercion and sexual humiliation of Iraqi
  prisoners in an effort to generate more intelligence about the growing
  insurgency in Iraq. A senior C.I.A. official, in confirming the
  details of this account last week, said that the operation stemmed
  from Rumsfeld's long-standing desire to wrest control of America's
  clandestine and paramilitary operations from the C.I.A.

  ....

  In a separate interview, a Pentagon consultant, who spent much of his
  career directly involved with special-access programs, spread the
  blame.  "The White House subcontracted this to the Pentagon, and the
  Pentagon subcontracted it to Cambone," he said. "This is Cambone's
  deal, but Rumsfeld and Myers approved the program". When it came to
  the interrogation operation at Abu Ghraib, he said, Rumsfeld left
  the details to Cambone. Rumsfeld may not be personally culpable,
  the consultant added, "but he's responsible for the checks and
  balances. The issue is that, since 9/11, we've changed the rules on
  how we deal with terrorism, and created conditions where the ends
  justify the means".

  ....

  In 2003, Rumsfeld's apparent disregard for the requirements of the
  Geneva Conventions while carrying out the war on terror had led a
  group of senior military legal officers from the Judge Advocate
  General's (JAG) Corps to pay two surprise visits within five months
  to Scott Horton, who was then chairman of the New York City Bar
  Association's Committee on International Human Rights. "They wanted
  us to challenge the Bush Administration about its standards for
  detentions and interrogation," Horton told me. "They were urging us
  to get involved and speak in a very loud voice. It came pretty much
  out of the blue. The message was that conditions are ripe for abuse,
  and it's going to occur". The military officials were most alarmed
  about the growing use of civilian contractors in the interrogation
  process, Horton recalled.  "They said there was an atmosphere of
  legal ambiguity being created as a result of a policy decision at the
  highest levels in the Pentagon. The JAG officers were being cut out of
  the policy formulation process". They told him that, with the war on
  terror, a fifty-year history of exemplary application of the Geneva
  Conventions had come to an end.

  The abuses at Abu Ghraib were exposed on January 13th, when Joseph
  Darby, a young military policeman assigned to Abu Ghraib, reported the
  wrongdoing to the Army.s Criminal Investigations Division. He also
  turned over a CD full of photographs. Within three days, a report made
  its way to Donald Rumsfeld, who informed President Bush.

  The inquiry presented a dilemma for the Pentagon. The C.I.D. had to
  be allowed to continue, the former intelligence official said. "You
  can't cover it up. You have to prosecute these guys for being off the
  reservation. But how do you prosecute them when they were covered
  by the special-access program? So you hope that maybe it'll go
  away".  The Pentagon.s attitude last January, he said, was "Somebody
  got caught with some photos. What's the big deal? Take care of
  it". Rumsfeld's explanation to the White House, the official added,
  was reassuring:  "'We've got a glitch in the program. We'll prosecute
  it'. The cover story was that some kids got out of control".

  ....

  The former intelligence official made it clear that he was not
  alleging that Rumsfeld or General Myers knew that atrocities were
  committed. But, he said, "it was their permission granted to do the
  SAP, generically, and there was enough ambiguity, which permitted the
  abuses".

  This official went on, "The black guys -- those in the Pentagon's
  secret program -- say we've got to accept the prosecution. They're
  vaccinated from the reality". The SAP is still active, and "the United
  States is picking up guys for interrogation. The question is, how do
  they protect the quick-reaction force without blowing its cover?" The
  program was protected by the fact that no one on the outside was
  allowed to know of its existence. "If you even give a hint that you're
  aware of a black program that you're not read into, you lose your
  clearances". the former official said. "Nobody will talk. So the only
  people left to prosecute are those who are undefended -- the poor kids
  at the end of the food chain".

  ....

Full article at:

http://www.newyorker.com/fact/content/?040524fa_fact

-- 
Erik Reuter   http://www.erikreuter.net/
_______________________________________________
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l

Reply via email to