List volume has been down lately(pretty much every list I am on), so
it hasn't been taking up loads of my time like it often does. So last
Thursday night I was goofing around, surfing the web and ended up
listening to Air America Radios webcast. The show on at the time was
The Majority Report with Garafalo and Seder.

It was an interesting show, but prior to one of their commercial
breaks, Sam Seder mentioned a "Poll" at hannity.com where surfers had
a choice between Bush, Kerry, and Nader, and had Bush Winning with
95%.

Now Sean Hannity isn't a very likeable fellow, but The Majority Report
(and by extension AAR also I believe) really have it in for him. They
also seemed to object to an "unscientific" poll on a partisan site. So
the proposal made was that everyone listening go vote at Hannity's
site and they even suggested a simple method for voting multiple times
(it doesn't involve any hacks).

Being bored this sounded like enormous, albeit tedious fun. So I went
and voted for Kerry a couple of hundred times.
By bedtime, Kerry was up to 50%, Bush at 49% and Nader with 1%.
AFAIWasC that sent an adequate message to the dittohead set, so I went
to bed satisfied that I had played my part in the political game of
dirty tricks.

Before I headed to work the next morning the poll had changed with
Kerry having 75% and Bush and Nader at 23% and 2% respectively.
So I went to work wearing a <BEG>.
When I returned home from work, and after reading my email, I decided
to follow up on the mischief to see if there was any fallout. (Who
knows, maybe Hannity would threaten to prosecute me)
What I found was quite a bit of blog groupie talk on both sides of the
fence across several sites. The upshot was that Hannity's webmaster
had not only shut down the poll, but had deleted it, even from the
archives(quite reasonable IMO since it *had* been exploited) and
replaced it with a poll with only anti-Dem choices: What is your
reaction to Al Gore after hearing his rants about President Bush?

*Finally lost it
*Needs more meds
*Should find a peaceful island

Very crafty Mr. webmaster dude! <TU>
The blog responses were the most entertaining. Majority Report Radio's
blog was quite self congratulatory and many were looking for new polls
to conquer. While I was sleeping (slacking some might say<G>) one guy
had written a voting program in Java(voting for Nader actually),
another guy wrote one in C, and another in VB. (don't have any idea if
they were effective or how much a part they played in the outcome)
Hannity's poll and the exploit were compared to the Diebold situation
and everyone seemed ready to take on Bush in November.

Over on Free Republic things were quite different. The Freeps (as they
style themselves) only discovered what was happening 10 hours too
late, and were desperately trying to "save" the poll by voting once
per person. There was a lot of lather, and blathering about how the
site had been hacked (it wasn't), how it was a liberal invasion(it
was), and confusion as to why they couldn't change the vote by voting.
IOW they had no clue as to how it was done.
(Really, it was just too simple<G>) But everyone seemed ready to take
on Kerry in November.

One thing I think both sides came away with is that these silly
unscientific polls on partisan sites don't amount to anything, but can
stir up a ton of crap.
Myself, I would have thought Hannity had more adherents. Before the
exploit about 2000 votes had been cast on the poll, and the exploit
added 18,000 to 22,000 more. (The poll ended with 25,000 votes before
it was cancelled which means Hannity fans and freeps and the like were
able to muster  an extra 3 or 4 thousand votes by that time)

http://www.majorityreportradio.com/weblog/index.php

http://www.hannity.com

http://www.majorityreportradio.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-comments.cgi?entry_id=203

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1143891/posts



xponent
http://www.pythonline.com/plugs/idle/FCCSong.mp3 Maru
rob


_______________________________________________
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l

Reply via email to