At 11:45 PM 6/12/2004 -0500 Julia Thompson wrote: >JDG wrote: >> >> At 11:02 AM 6/12/2004 -0500 Robert Seeberger wrote: >> >--===============1385683643== >> > >> >Another poll on Hannity's site was poked this week. >> >> I'm glad to see that the list conversation persisted at a high level while >> I was gone. >> >> <YAWN> >> >> JDG > >What, you don't have anything to add to the vampire thread?
I actually didn't find many "vampire" thread posts in my download when I returned. Maybe I missed that one.... then again, I can't really imagine that I would have anything to add. I was just simply struck by the fact that anyone would be particularly interested in the results of a stupid Internet Poll. Let alone that anyone would be so particularly interested in the results of said poll that they would go through the effort of actually trying to affect the results of said poll. And I can't even begin describe how unlikely I thought it would be that anyone would be so interested in the irrelevant attempts to influence an irrelevant poll that they would think that their bipartisan group of friends would be interested in reading about said attempts. JDG - Who thanks God that his political opponents might really be silly enough to send out their, quote, "SWAT Teams" to try and influence an irrelevant poll.... ;-)
_______________________________________________ http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
