Doug said: > "Eliasberg scoffed at the government's argument that the site is a > war memorial. "That doesn't honor Muslim veterans, Jewish > veterans, atheist veterans or agnostic veterans," Eliasberg said. > "It's a preeminent symbol of a religion. If we want to have a war > memorial on federal land, the government certainly knows how to do > that without using a divisive sectarian religious symbol."
I really don't understand what the problem is in using crosses as memorials. It's not as if anyone's being indoctrinated by a war grave, is it? Rich, who is with JDG on this one. GCU Evangelical Atheist
_______________________________________________ http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
