Erik Reuter wrote:
Sounds a bit paranoid to me. The article is almost completely lacking in specific facts, which should set off warning bells. What, specifically, are the problems with the sentencing guidelines, and what did Block and Nold offer as better alternatives? Why won't the author of the article reveal his real name?
You mean Cringely? His real name isn't a big secret... There were a few occasions in 1988 when his real name was "Nick Arnett," actually.
Nick
_______________________________________________ http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
