--- Erik Reuter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It was clear what you meant before your
> clarification, just not
> relevant. You can obviously comment on publicly
> available information,
> of which there is a great deal, as I posted. Acting
> like you know a
> lot about a subject based on secret information that
> you can't share
> may score points in the consultant world, but not
> here, especially
> when you are disputing someone else's point who
> isn't claiming secret
> information.

Well, Erik, I guess I'll have to live with your
disapproval...forgive me while I sob.  Anyone who read
what I wrote might note:
1. I "disputed" it only to the point that I thought it
was a little low
2. It was neither germane nor significant to the
discussion

If, at some point in the future, someone trusts you
with a job that involves decisions and information
that have to be handled responsibly, perhaps you will
understand where I'm coming from.

=====
Gautam Mukunda
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"Freedom is not free"
http://www.mukunda.blogspot.com


        
                
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
New and Improved Yahoo! Mail - 100MB free storage!
http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail 
_______________________________________________
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l

Reply via email to