On Sep 9, 2004, at 4:35 AM, William T Goodall wrote:
On 9 Sep 2004, at 11:01 am, Gary Denton wrote:
I have corresponded with Paul Lukasiak a number of times as it often seemed he and I and only a couple other people were the only ones who bothering to look at Bush's records. I remember seeing Scotty waving those microfiches in his hand at the podium and thinking, you know, I should be recording this because I bet there is something in there.
- - - - - - - - - - - -
Stung! A swarm of new media stories on young George W. Bush's dereliction of duty pops his heroic-leadership bubble. - - - - - - - - - - - -
Assuming all this is true, does it make any difference? Can Bush be charged with a crime? Will it prevent him winning the election or taking office if he does?
The Repubs wanted to impeach Clinton for getting a BJ in the oval office. Bush might well be guilty of dereliction of duty in a time of war, which is certainly a punishable military offense. If he is deposed and lies under oath it becomes impeachable as perjury.
He needs to be questioned, and the Dems need to get an independent prosecutor (a la Ken Starr) to dog him relentlessly.
Curiously the Repubs who were so interested in seeing "justice" done with Clinton remain silent on this case. How interesting. If their man has nothing to hide surely a deep investigation can only exonerate him.
Apparently becoming a born-again Christian means you can lie about your past. This type of behavior is rife in the reborns.
As to whether it'll stop re-election: It would take some tall self-deception to get even entrenched Repubs to vote for a documented liar.
-- WthmO
I've never held an opinion. I give them away freely. --
_______________________________________________ http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
