----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Robert G. Seeberger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, September 18, 2004 10:23 AM
Subject: Researchers invent antenna for light


> http://www.cnn.com/2004/TECH/science/09/17/light.antenna.reut/index.html
>
> Researchers said on Friday they have invented an antenna that captures
> visible light in much the same way that radio antennas capture radio
> waves.
> They say the device, using tiny carbon nanotubes, might serve as the
> basis for an optical television or for converting solar energy into
> electricity once properly developed.
>
> Radio and television signals are captured using antennas close to the
> size of the wavelength of broadcast radiation. These are often huge -- 
> thus the need for tall antennas.
>
> In a receiver, the wave excites electrons into meaningful currents,
> which are amplified and tuned to carry sound and pictures.
>
> But light is carried by photons -- 


>tiny packages that have the
> properties of waves and particles.

So are radio waves. :-)  Radio waves have longer wavelengths, lower
freqencies, and less energy per photon than do light waves.


>They are visible because cells in
> the eye capture them, but no one had been able to make a device small
> enough to act as an antenna.



> Yang Wang and colleagues at Boston College used carbon nanotubes,
> which are microscopic structures built out of carbon atoms.
>
> The tubes are aligned randomly.
>
> The light excites miniature electrical currents, they write in the
> latest issue of the journal Applied Physics Letters.
>
> A visible-light antenna might work by receiving a television signal
> superimposed onto a laser beam sent down an optical fiber, the
> researchers said.
>
> This technology may improve the efficiency and quality of television
> signals.
>
> Or it could be used as the basis of an efficient solar energy device
> that turns incoming light into an electrical charge to be stored in a
> capacitor, they said.

Sigh, violating conservation of both energy and charge. I think I know what
actually was done, but this was _very_ poorly written.

Dan M.


_______________________________________________
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l

Reply via email to