--- Damon Agretto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Gautam, I agree with the others; I think it highly > unlikely, but not impossible. I remember reading > AARs > from the initial invasion, and it seems the Iraqis > were a bit better armed than we had thought, > posessing > more advanced ATGMs and improved RPG rounds (no > doubt > through contacts in Russia/former SovUnion). To be > perfectly fair I have to acknowledge the other side > of > the debate too.
I didn't say it was _impossible_. I could, conceivably, step in at the plate Sunday afternooon. I'll have to have my agent call Theo Epstein...it would sure pay better than graduate school. Everyone watch the game to find out! Bob might even root for me. Those are just the odds I would ascribe to the possibility. The report on more advanced ATGMs was not true, btw - somebody screwed up their initial IDs. The improved RPG rounds I haven't heard one way or the other. You tell me, Damon. If you had lost men in a battle at Baghdad and it was covered up, how would you react to it? Bill Troy at III Corps is an old friend of mine - I can just imagine how _he'd_ react if someone told him to do something like this. ===== Gautam Mukunda [EMAIL PROTECTED] "Freedom is not free" http://www.mukunda.blogspot.com __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail - 50x more storage than other providers! http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail _______________________________________________ http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
