--- Gautam Mukunda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --- Warren Ockrassa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > True, but in the 20th Century the practice became
> > more common over
> > time, not less so, and that makes the current lack
> > -- utter lack -- of
> > coverage fairly telling. Recall this is the same
> > administration that
> > deliberately cordons off any possible protesters
> > into "free speech
> > zones" so Bush doesn't have to see them.
>
> Well, maybe it means we learn from experience.
>
> The "free speech zone" concept, by the way, is one
> most famously implemented by liberal universities, and
> put into place for the President under the Clinton
> Administration. There's nothing new about how the
> Bush Administration does it, particularly given the
> increased security threat it faces.
I don't know much about the history of FSZs, but I think they're a bad
idea all-around (same with pre-emptive arrests of dissidents)
-k-
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail is new and improved - Check it out!
http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail
_______________________________________________
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
