David Brin wrote: > > Given W's party animal past and his known tendency to > party with Arab pals, you can let your own > imaginations go with entrapment scenarios that are > both plausible and consistent with today's > monomaniacal/slavish obedience to Saudi Jihadist > priorities. > > What else could explain it? They have pictures. > Pictures in the XXI Century? They can be forged. Even movies. I would bet that Bush's - and Kerry's, Lula's, Blair's, Putin's, etc - marketeers have pictures and movies of them doing all nasty and/or impossible things, to present as soon as a _real_ evidence shows.
On the other hand, maybe they have _bastards_, and a single cell would give enough DNA to prove Bush's escapades. Gripping Hand: In the 1989 Brazilian election [a two-turn election: the first turn had more than ten candidates, the second turn had only the two with higher votes], there were two debates. The first debate was a tie. In the second debate, Collor massacred Lula, who could hardly say a coherent sentence. The reason was that Lula knew that Collor had some documents that would prove that Lula had a bastard daughter, and whenever Collor put his hand over the documents, Lula lost all concentration. Lula could not fight back, because _everything_ that could possibly be said about Collor had already surfaced: that he snorted coke, took part in orgies [both hetero- and homo-], that his divorce was caused when his wife caught him in bed with a man, that he was in a gang that murdered a 10-year-old girl back in the Dark Ages, etc. Considering W's dark past, I can hardly think that any extra evidence would embarass him too much. Alberto Monteiro the paranoid _______________________________________________ http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
