In a message dated 10/23/2004 10:42:00 AM US Mountain Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Richard Baker wrote: > > Which is not to say that Mendel wasn't an excellent scientist; > But he wasn't. His published figures are too good to be real: they don't pass a Chi-Square test, meaning that he adjusted them to look better than what he found in his experiments :-) Alberto Monteiro A mend to a meddlesome Mendel sum somehow surmises scientific scrutiny? Vilyehm _______________________________________________ http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
