> Bryon Daly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
<big snip>
> So it wouldn't be as worthwhile for the candidates
> to focus on CO
> because there's less return for their effort? You
> mean something
> like the 33 or so other states that the candidates
> don't need to
> bother with because they're virtually wrapped up?
> Oh horrors! What
> would the citizens of CO do? :-)
Some of us will vote for the portioning of the EC
votes, because we resent that right now our
presidential votes essentially *do not count*; some of
us don't need to have a candidate visit the state to
make up our minds WRT who gets our vote.
> And of course if all the states did this, then it
> wouldn't be a disadvantage to anyone.
I agree that it is a risky proposition from a certain
point of view, but if most states eventually portion
out the EC votes, you're right about no disadvantage.
"Laugh about it, shout about it, when you have to
choose -- Anyway you look at it, you lose." S&G
Debbi
A Mere 978 Posts To Go... Maru
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail Address AutoComplete - You start. We finish.
http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail
_______________________________________________
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
