On Tue, Nov 23, 2004 at 05:41:30PM -0700, Warren Ockrassa wrote: > No, but when you go ad hominem like this (third time in one > "argument"), it's very hard to assume you have actual facts on your > side. This is little more than hand-waving in an attempt to discredit > my "character" -- that is, you're trying to paint me as a heartless > villain who's pro-child rape so you can assert my opinions do not > matter.
I don't think it was intentional on Dan's part. He has some mental blocks, probably due to early childhood religious indoctrination, that I don't expect he'll ever manage to completely get through. It is a pity, since when they don't get in the way he does a lot of excellent, rational analysis. On the bright side, religion could have (and has, in others) turned out far, far worse. -- Erik Reuter http://www.erikreuter.net/ _______________________________________________ http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
