----- Original Message ----- From: "Warren Ockrassa" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Killer Bs Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, November 29, 2004 12:11 PM Subject: Re: So it begins.... Evangelicals to Bush: Payback Time
> On Nov 29, 2004, at 10:42 AM, Dan Minette wrote: > > > From: "Warren Ockrassa" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > >>> "If these clowns love Jesus so much, I see nothing wrong with sending > >>> them to meet him immediately." > > > > Whoops, I mis-read. You said something about killing Christians. So, > > that's OK? It appears so. > > I don't advocate killing Christians, just bigots. There are enough of > them in the world already. We don't need more. Then why be one? That would be a good place to start. > Consider that if this attitude had been in place against the Taliban, > the WTC might still be standing. And the Soviet Union would have been glass in the late '40s. >Sometimes it makes sense to eliminate > a pocket of virulent hatred rather than allow it to fester and turn > into a source of misery for thousands. What would you do? Kill everyone who is opposed to gay marriages? Kill everyone who thinks homosexuality is a sin? Just how many million do you want dead? Even if you are just talking about people who would be called bigots by most Americans, you are still talking about killing millions. > Consider that this attitude is one alleged reason for the assault on > Iraq. Kill the oppressors! Set hundreds of thousands of people free! > This is not seen as being even remotely senseless to millions of > Americans. Well, the administration's bungling of Iraq certainly doesn't help the arguement, but there were tens of thousands of people dying every year from his rule. > I'm not the one pushing for oppression or hatred. We differ on that...your posts seem hateful. I'll defend myself > using any degree of force necessary. The discretion is mine. If I feel > a need to use words to defend myself, I will use words. If I have to > put a bullet into the brain of someone trying to harm or kill me, I > will do that. Iff you are in clear and present danger, then it is self defense. Otherwise, it's homocide. > I'm using words now because I'd prefer not to have to kill anyone to > defend my rights, my person or my life, but I will if necessary. I > think the term here is "fair warning". Looks a lot like the kinda warning given by Bin Laden to me. > What part of the foregoing is unreasonable? Killing people without a clear and present threat to your life. > Frankly, I'm tired of this crap. I'd be perfectly happy to drop all the > belligerence if the religious intolerants would just shut the hell up > and let me (and mine) live peacefully. There are millions just like me > who feel exactly the same. You really think there are millions of gays who call for wholesale slaughter? > But those who have chosen to take sides against us refuse to allow > that. So yes, I advocate eliminating bigotry. If we can't do that, the > next step is to eliminate the bigots. That's not what you are doing. You posts indicate an embracing of the evil that was behind the murder of Matthew Shephard as your guiding light. Maybe the posts don't accurately reflect your mindset, all I have are words on a screen...but killing people because you believe they think the wrong things is evil. Dan M. _______________________________________________ http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
