> Behalf Of Damon Agretto > > The real irony is that we had to look to a democrat in > the form of Clinton for fiscal responsibility and > lowering the national debt, while the Republicans are > the big spenders. It used to be...quite the opposite.
I agree but to be fair, I think one of the big reasons that Clinton had that fiscal responsibility was because he had a Republican controlled Congress. <overgeneralization> They wouldn't pass what he wanted and he'd veto anything they wanted. </overgeneralization> Hence, spending was down. I'm not convinced things would have been the same had Clinton a friendly Congress. - jmh _______________________________________________ http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
