On Sat, Jan 08, 2005 at 11:41:17AM -0700, Warren Ockrassa wrote: > The mutt site is really more a vast collection of links, and I'm more > likely to align with Robert here -- if you're recommending the product > ostensibly you know something about it, and it might be much more > sensible to ask a direct question as opposed to sifting through a very > lengthy list of URLs, not a few of which are either stale or linked to > further punchlists of arcane commands, in order to get a quick piece > of information that can be answered in a one-line reply.
Now you're not paying attention. I did answer in a one-line reply. I said it was "fully customizable". And I rarely exaggerate. But that wasn't good enough for Rob. > I was going to ask what would be the most effective way to get mutt > working with a remote POP system *and* synced with my pre-existing > mail folders, but perhaps it wouldn't be a good idea. Perhaps I should > try sifting through those pages instead. It is in the FAQ. > If you don't like participating in discussions, especially about > things you seem to like, why are you on a discussion list? I don't like repeating myself, I don't like answering FAQ's when I have provided a link. I do like participating in interesting discussions where people pay attention and think or read a little bit before they post. -- Erik Reuter http://www.erikreuter.net/ _______________________________________________ http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
