On Wed, 26 Jan 2005 12:29:56 -0500, Erik Reuter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > * Nick Arnett ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > > If there is a crisis today, then a big correction is needed now. But > > if the crisis is many years away, as virtually every analysis says, > > then there is no need for major change. > > Yeah, yeah, the longer you put off fixing the problem the more your > generation can take from the coming generations. > > I've asked you before, and you have repeatedly failed to answer. If the > problem is such a small one, then will you champion to your generation > the measure of taking an immediate, across the board cut to 73% of > current SS benefits? That would bring the system into long term balance.
A future benefit cut in 2050 of around 25% to bring the system in balance when benefits are 40% higher than now is not the same as a 25% cut now,. [more gibberish snipped] Gary Denton _______________________________________________ http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
