On Tue, 1 Feb 2005 09:26:11 -0600, Dan Minette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'll admit I have not read this particular Collapse book yet, although > I've read plenty in the last 30+ years. But, if the review is at all > accurate concerning the claims in the book, then it is based on a selective > gleaming of facts. Brad DeLong on why Easterbrook's review is a piece of shit: http://www.j-bradford-delong.net/movable_type/2005-3_archives/000252.html Martin _______________________________________________ http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
