Dan Minette wrote:
I think he got that from:
<quote>
If so, why do we need to continue increasing the cost cost of future social security payments faster than cost of living increases?
Who says we do? We haven't in the past.
Perhaps I don't know what Erik meant in that sentence above. Here's how I read it: Why is it imperative that going forward, Social Security benefits must rise more quickly than the cost of living. E.g., if the cost of living goes up 10 percent, then Social Security benefits must go up more than 10 percent. If that's not it, I'd appreciate clarification.
If that is the meaning, then I still don't know where it's coming from. Who is saying this?
Nick
_______________________________________________ http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
