* Dan Minette ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > Not really. The concept that we should not use the bible as a means of > understanding nature predates science (as opposed to natural philosophy) > by hundreds of years. It was not presented by just any theorist either:... > rather it was Tommy Acquinis...who was _the_ most influential doctor of the > church (with Augustine a close second) almost 1000 years ago.
Galileo may have had a different opinion. Your revisionist religious apologist attitude is really depressing. -- Erik Reuter http://www.erikreuter.net/ _______________________________________________ http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
