At 07:52 PM Sunday 4/3/2005, JOHN GIORGIS wrote:
---- Original message ---- >Date: Sun, 03 Apr 2005 20:37:24 -0400 >From: Damon Agretto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Subject: Re: Babble theory, and comments >To: Killer Bs Discussion <[email protected]> > > >>On the Pope's death; I have always wondered how, if he is the true >>successor to Christ, he does not end up being resurrected bodily, as the >>Bible says His followers will do greater works than He (Jesus), and "By >>their fruits ye shall know them". Seems to me that if he is not healed or >>raised from the dead, this Roman cult cannot really claim to be the true >>successors to Christ. > >He's not the successor of Christ. He's the successor of >John, in whom >Christ gave his "authority" to create a church.
I believe you mean "Peter", not "John."
John D. - not sure that I'd put it that way anyways, but I think that he did mean Peter....
And if one interprets John 20-24 as some do, _John_ wouldn't need a successor since he is still around, unlike Peter . . .
--Ronn! :)
_______________________________________________ http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
