----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Martin Lewis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Killer Bs Discussion" <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, April 07, 2005 2:14 AM
Subject: Re: The Other Christianity (was Re: Babble theory, and comments)


> > The first is an African group, and the second is the Christian Science
> > Monitor.  In particular, we should note the lack of international
funding
> > for DDT.  Do you think this is unconnected with the political power of
the
> > environmental movement?
>
>  There's certainly nothing in the articles to suggest that.

<quote>
Despite this success, the international community has been slow to embrace
DDT and remains largely unwilling to fund DDT spraying programs.
Officially, the policy of the UN is that DDT is effective and should be
used until it can be replaced with less harmful chemicals. But in practice,
the chemical is hardly mentioned and almost never funded (DDT was not
mentioned in Tuesday's US bill). Instead, the UN advocates the use of
insecticide-treated bed nets, which most malaria experts say are far less
effective.

In the first two rounds of the Global Fund aid distribution, for example,
not a single country received money for DDT spraying, although several
projects to distribute insecticide-treated nets were approved. The US has
not yet said how their new money will be spent, but few expect DDT spraying
to be funded. One of only 22 countries using DDT Today, South Africa is one
of only 22 countries around the world still using DDT for malaria control
and only one of eight African countries that have officially requested
permission from the United Nations to use the chemical for mosquito
control. DDT advocates say far more would probably return to spraying if
the international community supported them in doing so. "A lot of [donors]
will say their official policy is that DDT can be used as a malaria
solution, but they don't fund it," says Tren. "But how bad does it have to
get before it's an emergency?"
<end quote>

Is your position that the environmental movement's arguements against DDT
have nothing to do with this?

Dan M.


_______________________________________________
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l

Reply via email to