On 4/17/05, Ronn!Blankenship <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Any chance of another take, this time with some line breaks here and there
> to supply readability?
> 
> -- Ronn!  :)

/scratches head. Formatted just fine in Gmail... Oh well. Give it
another shot. Or y'all could follow the links.

<start article>

U.S. eliminates annual terrorism report

WASHINGTON — The State Department decided to stop publishing an annual
report on international terrorism after the government's top terrorism
center concluded that there were more terrorist attacks in 2004 than
in any year since 1985, the first year the publication covered.

Several U.S. officials defended the decision, saying the methodology
used by the National Counterterrorism Center to generate statistics
had flaws, such as the inclusion of incidents that may not have been
terrorism.

But other current and former officials charged that Secretary of State
Condoleezza Rice's office ordered the report, "Patterns of Global
Terrorism," eliminated weeks ago because the 2004 statistics raised
disturbing questions about the Bush's administration's frequent claims
of progress in the war against terrorism.

"Instead of dealing with the facts and dealing with them in an
intelligent fashion, they try to hide their facts from the American
public," charged Larry Johnson, a former CIA analyst and State
Department terrorism expert who first disclosed the decision to
eliminate the report in The Counterterrorism Blog, an online journal.

A senior State Department official, speaking on condition of anonymity
because of the sensitivity of the issue, confirmed that the
publication was eliminated, but said the allegation that it was done
for political reasons was "categorically untrue."

According to Johnson and U.S. intelligence officials, statistics that
the National Counterterrorism Center provided to the State Department
reported 625 "significant" terrorist attacks in 2004. That compared
with 175 such incidents in 2003, the highest number in two decades.

The statistics didn't include attacks on U.S. troops in Iraq, which
President Bush as recently as Tuesday called "a central front in the
war on terror."

The intelligence officials requested anonymity because the information
is classified and because, they said, they feared White House
retribution. Johnson declined to say how he obtained the figures.

The numbers of incidents and fatalities in the report for 2003 were
undercounted last year, forcing a revision and embarrassing the White
House, which had used the original version to bolster Bush's
election-campaign claim that the Iraq war had advanced the fight
against terrorism. U.S. officials blamed bureaucratic mistakes
involving the Terrorist Threat Integration Center, the forerunner of
the National Counterterrorism Center, created under the Intelligence
Reform and Terrorism Prevention Act of 2004, which Bush signed Dec.
17.

 Rep. Henry Waxman, D-Calif., among the leading critics of last year's
mix-up, reacted angrily.

"This is the definitive report on the incidence of terrorism around
the world," Waxman said. "It should be unthinkable that there would be
an effort to withhold it — or any of the key data — from the public.
The Bush administration should stop playing politics with this
critical report."

The State Department published "Patterns of Global Terrorism" under a
law that requires it to submit to the House and the Senate Foreign
Relations Committee a country-by-country terrorism assessment by April
30 each year.

A declassified version of the report has been made public since 1986
in the form of a glossy booklet, even though there was no legal
requirement to do so.

 The senior State Department official said a report on global
terrorism would be sent this year to lawmakers and made available to
the public in place of "Patterns of Global Terrorism," but that it
wouldn't contain statistical data.

The official didn't answer questions about whether the data would be
made available to the public, saying, "We will be consulting [with
Congress] ... on who should publish and in what form."

One U.S. official who requested anonymity said analysts from the
counterterrorism center were especially careful in amassing and
reviewing data for 2004 because of the political turmoil created by
last year's errors.

Another U.S. official said Rice's office was leery of the center's
methodology, believing that analysts eager to avoid a repetition of
last year's undercount included incidents that may not have been
terrorist attacks. The U.S. intelligence officials said Rice's office
eliminated "Patterns of Global Terrorism" when the counterterrorism
center declined to use alternative methodology that would have
reported fewer significant attacks.

<end article>

There; manually copied and line-breaked. If that don't come out right, I give.

~Maru
_______________________________________________
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l

Reply via email to