On Thu, 21 Apr 2005 09:50:03 -0700 (PDT), Gautam Mukunda wrote > Under the leadership of Ramsey Clark, the IAC was the > only major "anti-war" group that refused to condemn > Saddam Hussein's invasion of Kuwait in 1990.
So, we've jumped from organizations that put together anti-war events, such as South Bay Mobilization here in my area, to ANSWER, which tries to coordinate activites of organizations like it, to AIC, with which ANSWER has an affiliation... and AIC has some ties to some people who disagreed with Trotsky, and he opposed Stalin, so therefore the anti-war demonstrations are Stalinist. Come on. What were you just saying about conspiracy theories? Ramsey Clark is representing Saddam Hussein. You say that makes him a bad person. Are you saying that anybody who would provide legal representation for Saddam Hussein is bad? Or that anyone who represents any criminal is bad? Are you opposed to civil rights, fair trials, the right to be represented by an advocate? Does he have any right to a trial, or should be just shoot him? Where do you draw the line? It seems as if you're saying that Clark's representation of Saddam proves that Clark is a bad person... how did you get there? Nick _______________________________________________ http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
