At 01:34 PM 4/22/2005 +1000, Andrew Paul wrote: >Dan, it was a rhetorical question. I know why he isn't, and frankly very >glad he isn't. But thank you for the refresher. I must learn to put more >umm, nuance in my typing tone.
It clearly wasn't a very good rhetorical question - and it wasn't the lack of nuance, it was the weakness of the question itself. JDG _______________________________________________ http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
