----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Horn, John" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Killer Bs Discussion" <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, May 20, 2005 12:20 PM
Subject: RE: Abortion and the Democratic Party
Re:TheAmericanPoliticalLandscape Today



>Hypotheticals are OK. But there comes a point when you have to say
>"this is way too unlikely to worry about".  Heck, if we worried
>about an unethical doctor approving a diagnosis that doesn't apply,
>they could just do it with a *real* DX that states the woman's life
>is in danger.

>Or should we get rid of the police and prisons because there is a
>non-zero chance that an unethical cop might plant evidence on an
>innocent person?

This interpretation is 180 degrees from what I intended.  So, let me
restate my point.  The Supreme Court case law states that that abortion of
a viable fetus can be regulated by the state only for those cases where a
continued pregnancy has no real chance of adversly affecting the health of
the mother in any way.

The obvious question is "how often would such cases occure?"

The answer is that these cases are hypothetically possible, but in
practice, they don't exist. There is always some risk to some aspect of a
womans health if she is forced to continue her pregnancy.  My point is not
that we must consider unlikely hypothetical cases, but that the law allows
no real state limitations on the  abortion of viable fetuses, because a
case where continued unwanted pregnancy has no negative effect at all on
the womans health is a hypothetical possibility, but practically
impossible.  A reasonable counterarguement would be evidence of court
rulings that, in in particular cases, there was no significant risk to the
health of the mother, and thus the state could prohibit the abortion. To my
knowledge, such an example does not exist because Blackman's decision,
quoted earlier,  gave such a broad understanding of a woman's health, that
he clearly rendered this practically impossible.

Dan M.


_______________________________________________
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l

Reply via email to