> Perhaps someone wants to argue that GWB
> should *not* have to endure a half-hour
> with her, and maybe even that he's not
> accountable to her (or even the public).

Why, because of her views, is half an hour with her more important than
half an hour with her other son, or his father (both of whom seem to think
his death is a nobel sacrifice).  How about all the others within a first
degree of kinship (parent, child, sibling)?  Don't they have an equal right
to half an hour?  That would be more than a full time job for a year.

> He certainly seems to be acting that way.

He is accountable to the public; that's what elections are for.  He clearly
won the last one.  Republicans also gained seats in the House and Senate in
2004; which indicates that the voting public had a preference for the
Republicans.  If that is changing, the 2006 elections are only a little
more than a year away, and intelligent Republican congressmen and senators
should have a feel for which way the wind is blowing.

Finally, remember I didn't vote for him for president (I did pick him over
a yellow dog for governor in '98).

Dan M.


_______________________________________________
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l

Reply via email to