On 10/3/05 11:49 AM, "Gibson Jonathan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Given the topics covered I'm going on my merry way knowing you disputed
> very little of what I put forth. As I find my morning unexpectedly
> free of responsibility I can turn some attention to this and I'll
> respond to what you deemed worthy.
It's what I have time for...really.
> Well ... when people assume the worst archetypes {not necessarily you
> here} and respond to the crudest hind-brain insults I hear out of
> people aping Rush & Savage on the construction site as well as the
> country club I think it's all too appropriate to talk in short-hand.
> But a 'world of stereotypes', I think not. I assess people by what
> they say and do. Answering you in-depth is part of this.
I've never been to a country club (crashing one does not count :) ). How
can you be a out of work construction guy and be in one? Stop using
stereotypes in your arguments and maybe I'll believe you.
> I think you are somewhat correct on the history of DB you've answered
> elsewhere, but the conservatives DID fight it's enactment and as unions
> were pretty much white-only back then you score partial points.
> Successive court and legal battles have since made it egalitarian and
> worthy of retaining now.
See response to Rob
> Once more into the breech, How does depressing the wages of a
> recovering community help them rebuild their lives?
Again, it probably won't happen. I am just curious on why this battle now?
> We really may only be arguing style over substance.
Probably, the more and varied t-cells that can attack any problem the
better. Its the effects that having so many t-cells active that I wonder
about.
When your only tool is a hammer, everything looks like a nail,
Matthew Bos
_______________________________________________
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
