Dan wrote:
I'm sure you read a report that stated that, but I've read lots of
reports on all sorts of things like that and I take them with a very
large grain of salt: e.g. I really really don't believe that the
evidence for Clinton
murdering his aids is reliable.
So, I would check the versimilitude of such reports. The DOE has, at
it's website
You're aware, I'm certain, that the Secretary of Energy reports directly
to George Bush.
And speaking of bias, you may or may not be aware that you yourself
project a strong, pro oil/energy industry bias. You displayed it
prominently in discussions about the California energy crisis, in
discussions about alternative energy and here in discussions about
Bush/Iraq.
I don't fault you for it; it is understandable given your profession and
your geographic location. I understand that you will probably deny it
vigorously. But from my POV it's blatant and obvious.
--
Doug
_______________________________________________
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
