Robert Seeberger wrote:
We (the international community) can always resort to a MAD-like
position to enforce anti-proliferation. (In fact that might be an
inevitability) A formalization of the "Nuclear Club" would be a sign
that such is indeed on the way.
But isn't that what the Security Council is? I mean, when it was set up,
it was the "Nuclear Club", and it used that MAD-like position to control
proliferation (though not as successfully as they might have hoped).
Isn't that why Iran is so dead-set against being referred to the
Security Council for removing the seals?
Of course, the fact that Iran removed the seals tells me all I need to
know - they don't want to pursue their nuclear program within the
confines of UN monitoring, therefore they are up to no good...
Cheers
Russell C.
-------------------------------------------------------
This email (including any attachments) is confidential
and copyright. The School makes no warranty about the
content of this email. Unless expressly stated, this
email does not bind the School and does not necessarily
constitute the opinion of the School.
If you have received this email in error, please delete
it and notify the sender.
-------------------------------------------------------
<<<<GWAVAsig>>>>
_______________________________________________
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
