> Robert Seeberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >From: "Deborah Harrell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >> "Robert G. Seeberger" wrote:

> >> Was Judas a villain?
> >> I don't think so myself. If one believes that
> >> Christ was divine and
> >> that God has a plan then Judas was just a part of
> >> the plan and cannot
> >> be faulted for advancing the sacrifice. <snip>

Yet it still tormented him to be in this role, if his
subsequent remorse and suicide are true stories. 
Furthermore, if suicide is a mortal sin, then he was
eternally condemned for doing 'what someone had to.' 
An argument could be made that he ought to have pled
to be forgiven instead ("The only unforgivable sin is
not asking for forgiveness"), but in the throes of
terrible remorse, rational thinking is not common. 
And the notion of Predestination just annoys the snot
out of me. <grimace>
 
> > As a child, I felt Judas was the worst sort of
> person;
> > that view wasn't challenged until I saw 'Jesus
> > Christ Superstar' - 'you told me to do it!' IIRC.
 
> These words had impact on me at the time:
> 
> Jesus! ...<snip>  
> ...And all the good you’ve done
> Will soon be swept away
> You’ve begun to matter more
> Than the things you say
> 
> Judas' POV had never been operative in my mind in
> any way before I heard these words...<snip>
> Modeling the mind of Judas was enlightening and
> broadened my concept  of salvation.
> I think it is central to "the meaning of life" and
> the idea of 
> salvation that some sort of villiany/moral-quandry
> is required in 
> order for there to be a choice and it is not always
> clearly defined  what "rightness" requires us to
do...

I also have problems with the whole 'there must be
darkness for light to shine' concept.  It _does_ make
a sort of sense, but, like wading through Aquinus or
Aristotle, I feel that there are cleverly disguised
absurdities - somewhere.
 
> >  But I have
> > problems with the 'planned betrayal,' as this
> makes
> > Judas a stool pigeon, and God an underhanded
> schemer.
 
> Many many times I have thought this. But further
> reflection leads me 
> to think that if "THE GREAT PLAN FOR SALVATION" were
> laid out in front 
> of everyone, life would be like a paint-by-number
> portrait. And to 
> extend the art metaphor, there would then be no
> "bad" art, and there 
> would be no masterpieces either. Life would then be
> a narrow spectrum  characterized by blandness.

Which ties back into predestination, it seems to me;
not that I would prefer bland-
 
It's cold comfort/ To the ones without it
To know how they suffered/ How they struggled about it
If their lives were dark and strange
They would likely have gladly exchanged
Them for something a little more plain
May be something a little more sane

We each pay a fabulous price
For our visions of Paradise
But a Spirit with a Vision 
Is a Dream with a Mission...
(as I recall from Rush 'Mission')

[me] But I have problems with the 'planned betrayal' -

Charlie B: "Precisely. It's yet more of why this
"loving god" made less and less sense to me. There's
just too much vengeance and sadism ascribed to this
deity... just makes no sense..."

My take on that:  human misunderstanding, both
innocent and especially deliberate, of the Divine's
intent has resulted in elevation of 'evil' desires
(revenge etc.) to "God's will."  Result: slaughter,
scorched earth, genocide.  Of course, that implies
that *I* have a handle on Er's intentions --hardly
possible, is it?  <wryness>

Max B: "I personally see it as the inherent flaw in
the Judeo-Christian-Muslim religions.  I can't
understand why people would choose to worship a deity
(Yahweh/God/Allah) that punishes with the one hand and
simultaneously provides and supports with the other
hand..."  

That _is_ rather Q-like, isn't it?  I cannot subscribe
to the idea that horrible things which happen are
"God's will," although I do have friends who find some
comfort there;  me, I just get angry.  While I do
believe that good things can be retrieved from horror,
with much hard work and near-heroic perseverence, to
think that suffering is *deliberately inflicted*
toward achieving some goal is anathema.  Even though
that is exactly what we do in medicine, as anyone who
has watched a loved one undergo chemotherapy can
attest.  I sideslip that one via 'pragmatic idealism'
- but it *is* a dodge. 
 
> > Indeed, it brings to mind the entire Garden bit as
> > another planned betrayal.
> 
> Again, something I've felt myself, but in this case
> I find the idea a 
> bit solipsistic (maybe narcissistic... 
> Not being much on Bible literalism, I feel that the
> Garden story is a 
> metaphor for the birth of human self-awareness. In
> that sense the 
> shame of loosing the Garden is akin to a longing for
> the "golden-age" 
> where we didn't have to think so much...

Not a literalist, as you know, but down through the
centuries, that story has been used to blame women for
mankind's ills.  That it offends me is irrelevent;
that it has been and continues to be a rationale for
oppressing women in fundamentalist traditions of 3
major religions is a travesty.

> > As a child, Frankenstein's creature was a horrible
> > monster who probably deserved to be hunted down
> > ...as an adult, it is Dr. Frankenstein who ought
> > to be censured for his abandonment of his faulty
> > creation...
 
>From a very early age my younger brothers and I
> would watch those old monster movies...<snip> 
> We *knew* the monster was us and we felt the
> creatures alienation and desire for acceptance... 
> We were the wolfman too. We knew that desire would
> overwhelm us...and that we could lose control...
> We knew Dracula...evil and unredeemable, but...
> also the coolness of pursuasion, the tool of desire
> and an unconscious 
> precursor of our male sexual awakening.
> The Mummy was the embodiment of revenge, of the rage
> that smoulders 
> deep inside until opportunity presents itself.
> Those old films were effective to a great degree
> because they 
> reflected the emotions of the inner child and are
> metaphors for our earliest feelings.

Ooh, well-put.  The Enemy Within is always there,
always dangerous - but not always evil.

Debbi
Take The Reins Maru

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 
_______________________________________________
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l

Reply via email to