--- In [EMAIL PROTECTED], Doug Pensinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Ronn! wrote: > > > <<http://www.cnn.com/2006/HEALTH/06/14/sex.selection.ap/index.html>> > > I don't understand what the objection is (the ones stated in the article > are lame), and I'm really surprised that the U.S. of all places is the one > allowing the procedure.
Isn't the real danger of ending up with an unbalanced population, making it difficult for a generation to find a mate, worth noting? And is this really functionally different from eugenics? JDG _______________________________________________ http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
