On 31 Aug 2006 at 2:36, William T Goodall wrote: > > What's your point? The guy was [allegedly] responsible for forcing > > girls as young as 12-y.o. to "marry" older men, giving the girls no > > choice in the matter. Are you suggesting that under "religious > > freedom" he should have been allowed to do that? Or what? > > What is religious freedom if it isn't that?
That you're, again, deliverately using a cult - NOT a religion - to launch another anti-Religious tirrade. Next come the quotes - not the laws, the quotes you pull pout of context, then... Well-worn path. I remember now why I unsubscribed. AndrewC Dawn Falcon _______________________________________________ http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
