On Sep 14, 2006, at 3:34 PM, Charlie Bell wrote:
On 14/09/2006, at 7:26 PM, Gibson Jonathan wrote:
Hey, there was a lot of mass and volume to be those structures and it
is little wonder some of it spread out. The point we are all
scratching our heads over is how they didn't topple off to one side.
None of these buildings {though WTC7 was a shorter one} acted as any
other building has. Ever.
Good assertion. So let's see the evidence. Show us please a case study
of a building collapse *of this construction type* that has toppled
further than half its width in a progressive collapse.
If you can show us one that has acted another way, then we have a
comparison line.
I think it's fair to not go line by line through your post before we
have a basic data point.
Charlie
Charlie,
You've turned the whole thing in it's head. Your asking me to prove
support for your position that the official story, du jour, holds true.
There has been no such examples provided that I can find, nor was the
single architect I was able to reach as I reply.
Your task would be to start citing where else this rarified and
extra-ordinary event is not so very exotic. My claim is that it's
unique: guess what, my null search results thus far prove my point.
Can you disprove this
Where's your examples that prove your assumptions?
Jus' wundrin'...
Jonathan Gibson
www.formandfunction.com/word
_______________________________________________
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
