Jim Sharkey wrote:
...
From my personal point of view, as a registered NJ voter, I don't
really mind the idea of extending protections to committed gay couples
similar to committed straight couples, in general. I'm still not a
fan of calling it "marriage," but that's my cross to bear, not
others'.
Jim--
I agree, there's nothing wrong with calling it a
civil union, and that should maybe be the
official name. But I confess that I'd personally
call such things "marriages", just to upset
traditionalists.
---David
A rose by any other name, Maru
_______________________________________________
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
