On 14/08/2007, at 8:55 AM, Andrew Crystall wrote:

> On 13 Aug 2007 at 8:54, Robert Seeberger wrote:
>
>> Robert Seeberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2007/08/ 
>>> revised_temp_data_reduces_glob.html
>
> As usual... check Realclimate first?
>
> http://www.realclimate.org/index.php/archives/2007/08/1934-and-all-
> that/

"Heh. Try elsewhere for anything LIKE balanced. I'm NOT going to go
into
the entire flamewar about why. (Hint: PR flacks, not scientists)"

Your words.

So why is realclimate.org now worth checking? What's changed?

Charlie.

_______________________________________________
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l

Reply via email to