On Oct 4, 2007, at 1:40 AM, Charlie Bell wrote:

> On 04/10/2007, at 11:13 AM, jon louis mann wrote:
>
>> pedestrians are not much better.  i would think anyone ambulating
>> by feet or bike would take more care because they are far more
>> vulnerable.  i notice a lot of bicyclists exhibit their share the
>> road attitude by riding double and forcing cars to match their
>> speed if they can not pass.
>
> Two abreast is legal just about everywhere, and a bicycle is
> *entitled* to the *whole lane*. Even in LA. Most cyclists stay
> towards the gutter out of courtesy, not because they have to.

I would bet that no bike -- or a motorcycle or a car -- is "entitled" to
a lane. I would bet that it is rather like a "yield" situation, in which
nobody _has_ the right-of-way, but others are required to yield it.

If I recall correctly from taking the CA driver's license test, there
is nothing that legally prevents two _cars_ from occupying the same
lane. The creators of certain narrow-body electric cars tout this as
another reason to purchase their vehicles.

That said, here in California, riding two-abreast appears to be legal,
but after a fatal accident in So Cal, the sheriffs who patrol the
Pacific Coast Highway asserted that they would start ticketing cyclists
who enjoy their legal privilege.

Dave


_______________________________________________
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l

Reply via email to