jon louis mann wrote:
> I usually ignore messages that are badly quoted. Some of them I even
> delete without opening (too many messages to read, not worth the time)
> Alberto Monteiro
>
> the subject line determines which messages i open, and if i reply, i
> often excerpt what i need to make it easier to clarify the thread. all
> the <<<s make it difficult for me to follow who is saying what...
> jon mann
Jon--
Hi. I like the '>' characters. All you have to do
is count them to see who wrote what. Maybe it's a
matter of what one's used to, but I bet they're pretty
standard.
The method you used a couple posts ago would work,
where you were putting the author's names in parentheses.
My one problem with it is that every line should have
had at least one '>', so it's clear that all the material
is quoted. (I don't know what you're using, but
"paste as quotation" works pretty well in Thunderbird.)
---David
> > > > > > > Maru
_______________________________________________
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
