At 03:35 PM Friday 8/22/2008, Dave Land wrote: >On Aug 22, 2008, at 7:13 AM, Julia Thompson wrote: > > > On Fri, 22 Aug 2008, Ronn! Blankenship wrote: > >> That's because the proper medical term is cranio-rectal > >> intussception*, or "CRI" . . . > > > > Didn't work on *that*, either. > >Two problems here: > >First, the medical term that Ronn! may be groping for (eww!) is >"intussusception", not "intussception".
I wonder how that happened: I took some pains to get it correct before I sent it. I wonder if a spell-checker somehow decided all by itself to get it wrong . . . >Second, a CRI is a "Cranio-Rectal Inversion". > >Google THAT and you'll find plenty of mentions. > >Dave But a medical professional knows that they are not the same thing, and that INTUSSUSCEPTION is the more accurate term for one body part having been slid or telescoped into another. A Bad Spell Maru . . . ronn! :) _______________________________________________ http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
