Let us begin with this basic knowledge. This is found in >the tautology of true and false statements or simple basic yes or >no logic. I am sure yes and no is not beyond the grasp of any conversant on this page. >The truth or falsity of a particular idea exists in the >truth of logic, which is either TT or TF or FT or FF. >Given this mathematical probability tree the yes/no >existence of an idea is TF or FT it cannot be TT or FF in >those events being true factually or false factually. >The Boolean analogies and API applications are found in >these basic mathematical applications in semantics and >also in statistics. However, I must say I do not know >where it rests in gibberish if such a science exists at >all.
>Now that this groups discussions exist beyond this basic >scientific principle of a tautology I assumed that the >expressions on the ideas and science were suitable for >evaluation on these basic principles which provide the >assembly languages and logic of both the world of >semantics, computer and scientific communications; >Boolean analysis and now I am reaching when I say alien >technologies because the term itself indicate it is out >of the human conscience reach although human accept alien >as being. >Since the probability tree express 100% then the existence of TT is 25% and FF >>is 25% then the TF and FT are flip sided of each other both comprising of 25% >>making the 50% for that phenomenon that Andrew C implied by saying if >mathematical. The flip side is if not. >The arguments about perception are different than those of mathematics. >Perception rests in the >receiver not the sender. Altruistic ideas, which may >drive the individual, are >mater of receiving what is sent and therefore there >is the idea of a mindset. An >idea arises from internal or external resources. > I propose an innate potential >within humans which process ideas. I propose >that humans are aware and driven >from birth. The mathematics of statistics is >used to determine if such ideas are >true of false of partially true and >false. Ideas generated by mind-set are separate from human ideas so my >>reading Andrew C >Yes, but where does the ability to do so come from? I'd >argue that only Humans and a few other animals have the >ability to >comprehend altruistic ideals and here we >touch on self->awareness: I would assume he touches on self-perceptions and good senses to mean hearing seeing and higher intelligence in humans and animals. >I say to Andrew C >>50% given the measure of the tautology based in the logic of yes/no but the human perception is more than mathematical logic so >>Say it is something more than mathematic logic, which drives the ability This simply indicate to Andrew C that he has made a grand leap from altruistic ideaism as being in touch with one self to propose > >> And if it's like mathematics it raises the question would aliens > >> Develop the same ethics as us? > > All or this is still separated from whether a mind set is wired to receive the idea of being altruistic. And I attempt to provide a scientific argument related to the mathematical evaluation, which would limit his argument to 50% certainty using any Boolean system. He further proposes that aliens might develop our ethics if it’s like mathematics. I am believed that the question beg answering so I ventured that the helix of genetic of the human structure has something to do with the mindset which we humans inherit. It is the basis of the movement of energy and the processes and drives our awareness. Our feelings and processing ideas are unique and we may or may not see something call an idea. Some minds are said to be empty and even after receiving a barge of ideas, say in a class on booleagean mathematics or one measuring finite existence, some mind-sets remains blank. What is seen, imagined, repelled or retained is based upon the individual’s mind-set. If the receiver is wired to accept the stimulus of the idea and has a potential suitable to accept altruism it is increased in society as part of the ethical i.e. good life. So I was satisfied Andrew C proposal that suggest Andrew C wrote 9-4-08 >Yes, but where does the ability to do so come from? I'd >argue that only Humans and a few other animals have the >ability to comprehend altruistic ideals - and here we >touch on self-awareness: Understanding of the self as an >individual is key to accepting others as individuals and >enables true altruistic actions. Indicating to me that altruism rest upon someone being in touch with their own self and the visions related to such ideas is individually driven. I did not necessarily agree with the idea that altruism is an unselfish action, which is evident in children because I do not equate altruism with unselfishness. I cannot understand the ability to care for another without caring for oneself. It is my belief that once a human acts it is first upon self. Even if the focus of the mindset is upon another it must first be turned on. But that is another argument. PV _______________________________________________ http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
