> > But like "random mutations" in biology,
> "change" for change's sake is
> > more often detrimental rather than beneficial. And
> the government
> And with something like a single payer system, the track
> record isn't
> good. Again.. *points to Holland's system*
> AndrewC
of course, holland, and other western countries, are way ahead of america,
andrew. i am not talking about "change", simply for change's sake. what would
be detrimental rather than beneficial is mc cain's proposal for "universal"
health care... obama's plan is at least a step in the right direction, but
still not as good as the nader. or kucinich model, or what you have in the
netherlands. like they say, "it's not much, if it's not dutch"!~).
jon
_______________________________________________
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
