At 09:20 PM Thursday 11/13/2008, Jon Louis Mann wrote: > > > Why am I not surprised that you would cite the Onion...? > > > I don't know. Perhaps because you think that I have a > > good sense of humor? > >i don't think so, it was a substitute for answering my questions, >and you use humor for insolence and to avoid the issue.
Or just maybe this study is right: <http://www.nytimes.com/2008/11/04/science/04tierney.html?_r=1&em&oref=slogin> >taxes are SUPPOSED to be collected to provide services to the citizens, etc. >[...] >mc cain/palin kept talking about redistribution and socialism as if >they were dirty words, when in fact, they are the very reason for taxation. No, as you just said, they are to pay for the government to provide services to the citizens. > we had a revolution because of taxation w/o representation, duh! And as some wag once said and many since have repeated, "Taxation with representation ain't all that great, either." . . . ronn! :) _______________________________________________ http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
