Julia, > OK, that one looks somewhat more interesting than some of the Tweets I see > dumped to LiveJournal.
Thank you (if you're referring to my twitter feed). I try to remember that the people who are following me (there are a little under a hundred, with some falling off and new ones replacing them over time) are an audience, so I write with them in mind. > Then again, the less interesting things are in response to other Tweets, > and the person Tweeting the most is engaged in discussions with other > folks. In my experience, the least interesting tweeple are the ones who use twitter as a kind of public instant message with their friends. Every message is a reply to someone else, and they often look something like: @boogerbrain *Yawn* @mesopotamia That's what she said! @fooboo Was that thing actually _on_ your plate? @noobee If you say so, but actually, I like em crunchy. I wonder if these people have anything at all to say on their own... There is a hierarchy of engagement on Twitter in which following is worth one "point", replying is worth more -- maybe two to five "points", and retweeting is maybe double that again. I don't think I've been retweeted. Not bleeding edge enough, I guess. _______________________________________________ http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
