At 10:45 PM Monday 1/5/2009, Julia Thompson wrote:
>On Mon, 5 Jan 2009, Rceeberger wrote: > > > http://www.physorg.com/news150388964.html > > > > An apple and an anti-apple might not fall at the same rate. > > > > > > > > xponent > > But A Mac And An Anti-Apple 2E Do Maru > > rob > >Wow, it's almost 11PM, and I was almost despairing of encountering a good >reason not to have liquids at the computer today! Congratulations, Rob! > > Julia Humor aside, wasn't the idea that a particle and its corresponding anti-particle might fall at different rates under the influence of gravity put forward and supposedly tested and rejected back in the 80s? I read the article and didn't see how this was different from what was suggested then (though the details are lacking) . . . . . . ronn! :) _______________________________________________ http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
