On Dec 4, 2009, at 6:48 PM, Dave Land wrote:

On Dec 4, 2009, at 8:52 AM, William T Goodall wrote:

On 3 Dec 2009, at 21:11, Bruce Bostwick wrote:

All religions are fake from the perspective of those seeing them from outside.

No religion is fake from the perspective of its true believers.

Not a very useful metric, all things considered.

I see all 10,000 or so current religions as fake and a religionist sees 9,999 of them as fake :-)

Almost in Agreement Maru

This is one of the best statements you've ever made.

You sound very much aligned with Leo Tolstoy, who, in his attempts to promote nonviolent resistance as the truest expression of the teachings of Christ (which he saw as a philosophy of life, not as the words of the Son of God, nor the ravings of a lunatic), had nothing, nothing at all good to say about churches. In fact, he goes as far as to say that their very existence as churches is in opposition to Christ.

You might like to read his "The Kingdom of God is Within You", in which he presents his arguments, which have reminded me of yours from time to time, quite brilliantly.

Dave

Tolstoy and I seem to agree rather fundamentally on the nature of those teachings. The portions of the gospels that seem to have been original writing (even if they *were* written as much as 200 years after whatever actually happened) very much seem to be about philosophy of life and a way of living, very much opposed to even the *idea* of an organized church. I think Christ would have been completely appalled at what was made of his teachings after the era of, say, Constantine and the First Council of Nicaea, and my guess is that the results would have made chasing the moneylenders out of the temple look mild by comparison.

But I'm a religion of one, and those teachings are but one of my many resources ..



_______________________________________________
http://mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l_mccmedia.com

Reply via email to