On Fri, May 9, 2008 at 7:30 PM, Lyle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi All, > This last week I've overhauled a load of database routines grouping > methods into easy to use objects. All the routines are currently MySQL > based. My future plans are to have MSSQL, SQLite and maybe PostgreSQL as > database options.
Out of curiosity, what's your goal with this? There's no shame in picking one technology and sticking with it, to the exclusion of others: you can simplify your codebase, reduce maintenance effort, and generally get on with life in other areas. If your goal is to produce a generally accessible library that's DB-agnostic, that's a noble goal, but usually quite aside from a typical business objective. P > > My current experience is with MySQL only. Does anyone know of any good > resources for doing this? > > I'm guessing the syntax for creating tables, etc, will be different for > each. But most of the SQL queries will be the same?? Am I safe to assume > this or am I going to hit some real problems? > > > Lyle > _______________________________________________ > BristolBathPM mailing list > [email protected] > http://mailman.bristolbath.org/mailman/listinfo/bristolbathpm > _______________________________________________ BristolBathPM mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.bristolbath.org/mailman/listinfo/bristolbathpm
