HI Lyle, > * a commercially positive IP licence - not something that has an > > agenda (e.g., GPLv3) > > What licence would you recommend? I want it to be really open. The only > thing I can think of not wanting is for people to sell it as is, by > itself, for profit.
I think it would be hard for someone to charge for software if the source of the same software is giving it away for free. Their 'profit margin', if any, would be the value they could add to it. > I'd be more than happy for it to be used > commercially and to be a part of a package that is sold for profit. If > that makes sense. > > It really depends on the nature of the system you want to create - the ecosystem it needs to enter and the ecosystem you want to create. Here are some licences that I think are worth a look: * MIT * Apache * http://www.perlfoundation.org/artistic_license_2_0 Nige > > > Lyle > _______________________________________________ > BristolBathPM mailing list > [email protected] > http://mailman.bristolbath.org/mailman/listinfo/bristolbathpm >
_______________________________________________ BristolBathPM mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.bristolbath.org/mailman/listinfo/bristolbathpm
